Government bond yields decreased by 4 to 3In Russia consumers are still novices and candidThis is a management lesson that I will not forgetFind the articles of the series of summer onCréaplast achieved last year a turnover of 580A commando operation in full summer torporLast Thursday Xiao Yu commissioned his seventh credit cardSince then he was caught by urbanizationThe problem is that they are exempt from seizureThe aspirations of each and the other joinAbsolutely not. How could we determine the form and the terms of the loan while it is not known yet what it will fund, or how much is needed And who knows today what will be the market conditions and the situation of the economy early next year At this time, will weigh the pros and cons for not wasting the money from the French: the national debt to depositors, it is more inspiring, but it is more expensive. Need to see how much.
For the moment, there are rather a risk of deflation. And if longer term there is a risk of all liquidity injected into the economy could become inflation, this risk appears smaller in Europe and the United States. What is certain is that we do not back a loan indexed on the model of those who once ruined public finances.
When you want to engage the French, create a momentum of confidence in the future, should we start a bond which is, in itself, a mark of defiance
When you cross one of those periods where the world switches to a new growth model, should invest heavily to advance. Not doing so would be a historic mistake. The crisis destroyed, we create. But how to fix an amount before having decided all together what we need
It must move from a purely accounting approach to an economic approach of public expenditure. The logical sequence, it is first to define the areas that we believe are decisive for our place in the world of tomorrow. Then, he must examine the economic, social, each project financial performance. But these projects must not all come from the top, it must also engage the creativity, imagination, launching calls for projects. This new investment policy must be used to initiate a dynamic of innovation on a large scale and collectively change our report in the future.
Can do everything, but should exclude the debate no dimension. Of course, there is research, technologies of tomorrow with areas such as the life, energy, transport of the future, imaging sciences and others still where with effort we can be leaders. But our future is also played in the re-industrialization of the basins for job in difficulty, in the integration, training or enhancement of our heritage.
It must first invest to enhance our strengths, to get the best out of ourselves, of our resources, our territories, our heritage. A historical monument abandoned, neglected territory, is a deprivation; a child that it is not educated, trained, not socialized step, it is a load to come because instead of being a producer, a creator, it may be all his life an assisted. We cannot think about our future without taking into consideration the heritage dimension nor the human and social dimension.
The Prime Minister argued that the projects should have a high-yield economic, social or financial. He is right.
This type of rule has never solved any problem. How to clean up public finances after the crisis The France said: we must invest. Ms Merkel said: it must lower the
